Rainshadow Posted March 4, 2020 Report Share Posted March 4, 2020 Just a couple of questions asking your opinion(s). Given that the NAM is done as far as upgrades go and no one pays attention to the SREF. For the qpf/snowfall evaluation spread sheet for next cold season I was thinking about substituting the GGEM for the SREF and the UKMET for the NAM. This is based on the UKMET still being available on pivotal. If they drop it I could keep the NAM or substitute the GEPS or ICON for it. Thoughts? We are up to 10,000 looks on this thread in this dead winter (amazing! ), we can't be doing everything right with this, can we? Second question. This is more semantics for the Models section. I was thinking of keeping all modeling upgrades in one thread and just changing the title when a new one comes along, vs starting a new thread for each and every upgrade. Thanks for viewing these threads! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tombo82685 Posted March 6, 2020 Report Share Posted March 6, 2020 yes, get rid of the nam and Wrefs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rainshadow Posted March 6, 2020 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2020 23 minutes ago, tombo82685 said: yes, get rid of the nam and Wrefs Do you have a preference as to which two models or ensembles to replace them with? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tombo82685 Posted March 6, 2020 Report Share Posted March 6, 2020 5 hours ago, Rainshadow5.8 said: Do you have a preference as to which two models or ensembles to replace them with? big 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parsley Posted March 7, 2020 Report Share Posted March 7, 2020 14 hours ago, tombo82685 said: yes, get rid of the nam and Wrefs I agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.