Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by retiredwxman

  1. offshore location not so good for nj coast unless it is farther e or se. Means more of a n/ne wind. Bad for tidal flooding and also beach erosion, especially since it could be long duration. Interesting looking longer range, GFS moves it out to sea then loops it back west (too far east to hit us again) before moving away finally.
  2. I sorta hope the models are right giving us rain from Hermine. An inland track and then off the sj coast would be good for heavy rain over the philly region. With Tropical Systems, the heaviest rain tends to be on the west side of the track, due to circulation and friction (and uplift in our area). We need the rain, but lets keep it under 5 inches so any flooding is lessened. An inland track would also help keep winds from being too strong and limit beach erosion as southerly and southeast winds limit beach erosion vs the n/ne winds which cause erosion.
  3. Amazing the flip flop of the GFS and how bad it can be long range. The 12z run on Aug 27th for 384 showed a strong cold front in ohio valley and not tropical conditions. The 18z is just the opposite with a strong hurricane approaching the E Coast. Anyone else betting that this is wrong.
  4. Just something I came across that may interest all of us. I wish I could afford it. I didn't know where to post this, but thought medium and long range might apply since it is happening the next few weeks. I am talking about the first cruise through the Northwest passage/Canadian Northwest passage. Here is a link... http://www.foxnews.com/travel/2016/08/25/where-luxury-meets-danger-inside-first-northwest-passage-cruise.html It costs minimum 22k per person. It should last 35 days. It starts in Alaska and ends in New York City. I could not find the exact dates of the cruise.
  5. I hope the cool down is correct. Normals after Labor day are around 80, so even above normal is not bad, as long as it isn't record highs. We do need rain though. So far out in time, I don't trust much in way of models too long range. Any hurricane or typhoon entering the jetstream can have a big impact and change the worldwide pattern.
  6. Finally the zero isotherm gets close to the US in Maine. Per the ECMWF from 12z Thu, the 10 day fcst for 12z Sep 4 shows the zero isotherm at h8 just nw of Maine. With the Tropical systems and now the H8 zero, Autumn is finally showing up. Bob
  7. I was just looking at the ECMWF and it looks like Fl Panhandle after Miami/Keys. This far out though, all of FL and the Gulf Coast should be paying attention. NHC 5 day also supports a storm headed to Fla. Amazing to also see GEM and UKMET from 12z also show a system heading to east coast of FL. The ECMWF looks to be the farthest South. Hoping for colder weather and snow in as little as 3 months. Bob
  8. If you or anyone who skis want to ski Europe, I highly recommend it. They have skiing for all abilities, but depending on resort, some have more easy, others, more of the difficult, just like in USA. Skiing in Europe is different from here. The food is much better and I like to say that in the US we eat to ski, but in Europe we ski to eat. Also, if you do want to go, just check out the ski clubs. Most include breakfast and dinner at the ski resort, as well as a room and transportation. They list their trips in the summer and the overseas ones usually book quickly. Some clubs do an extensio
  9. Yes they have. The French Alps where we will be skiing are 95 percent open. The 5 percent that isn't open is the extreme skiing which I avoid. With the dump they should get this coming weekend, I expect pristine skiing conditions.
  10. They are beautiful and totally different vs N. America including the Rockies.
  11. Maybe it is too early to start a new thread for next sunday possible storm, but if it happens, my new snowblower jinx will still be in effect since I will be out of the country. However, I will be seeing my own deep snow storm in the French Alps (skiing). Can't call it a blizzard there since they don't usually get the wind with their storms. Interesting progs on both the ECMWF and GFS for that area next Sunday Feb 7.
  12. are you sure you don't want to be call "Snowshadow", we already have "Rainshadow"
  13. I hate to say this, but I have a "feeling" we won't see any more big snows in southern NJ. My reasoning is that I just upgraded my snowblower and bought a new one. My old one still runs OK, but I decided to go to a 2 stage. I have a big driveway and sidewalk, but it was more work getting rid of the snow/slush that the plows piled at the bottom of my driveway. I hope I get to use the new blower, but we all know about a jinx when you buy a new one.
  14. Just measured 4.3 inches here in Westampton, about 1 mile from NWS office. Bedtime.
  15. I am not predicting this, but am just answering your question... 1. We could get tstms in the warm sector to the east of the low that "steals" moisture and blocks the flow of moisture into the system. 2. The models are wrong and the system moves out to sea much faster that expected. 3. More warm air moves inland than expected. 4. The very heavy snow stays to the south (opposite of number 3) Again, I do not expect any of the above.
  16. The instability could be with a dry slot, but many times it is with the strongest waa as colder air continues to move in or develop aloft. Are you able to see any of the diagonal or cross wise instability in any of your procedures?
  17. I was sorta skeptical about this storm for the region around PHL 2 days ago even though the models did show it coming. However, after watching the last several runs of different models, I am now a believer. I orginally was thinking, a storm moving offshore near ORF and heading ENE out to sea, how do we get the high pcpn amounts fcst. Now I can see how it happens. One thing I like to look at is model dynamics and support for heavy pcpn that may be forecast. In another words, the why of the model, not just what the model is forecasting. After looking at the latest NAM and GFS, First, we
  18. I think they are well timed, just over 48 hrs in advance. They are watches, not warnings.
  19. Good luck to all operational forecasters. It is easy sitting here and looking at the weather pattern now that I am retired. However, when you actually have to forecast numbers and pinpoint the forecast by location, amount and time, that is not so easy.
  20. Be careful assuming looking at the very high QPF's fcst by the models. This far away from the high precip moisture that is available on the e and se side of the low you will need very strong dynamics and/or instability to squeeze that amount out. M However, I still think snow amounts in excess of a foot should fall near PHL. Looking at the soundings, the snow formation zone looks to be 650 to 600 mb meaning good dendritic formation based on the fcst temps in this layer. This means better than 10:1 ratios. Considering my expected higher ratios, these higher ratios should offset the lower qp
  21. Just my 2 cents but... I don't see much if any sleet or mixed pcpn up to phl this run. With the upper low tracking ene rather than up the coast, it will be hard to get enough warm air this far north to get mix. Using the ECMWF, the zero line at h8 is S of State of Delaware. Even though some warmer air may be up to 800 or even 750 mb, I dont see it making it up here. I also looked at the GFS and it seems too cold for any mix based on track and soundings. GFS soundings for Sat night imply embedded convection with some instability around 600 mb and above. Psbl thundersnow if it forms,
  • Create New...