Jump to content

Sign in to follow this  
Chubbs

Winter Outlook 2018-19 Discussion. October/November Temp Combo Ruling The Local Roost, Eurasia Snow Coverage Please Step Aside

Recommended Posts

^ we take.... another fig crushing cold winter with abundant snow

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, tombo82685 said:

^ we take.... another fig crushing cold winter with abundant snow

I don't have much confidence in guidance parsecting the type of el nino or la nina for that fact and the tendency in the spring for the guidance to go el nino happy (just like last winter was suppose to be).  But it is ironic that the guidance link within Charlie's post looks nothing like modoki.

Capture.JPG.4ff75c107d525f56b5ee21680418c3bc.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The ENSO modeling update for Mid June is holding its own for an el nino for next winter. The dynamical model peak has increased from +0.8C in April to +1.0C this month.  The four models that handled last winter the best (attached graph if you see otherwise) are all in nino territory except for the Aussie's. But if one corrects current conditions, even that model would bring weak el nino conditions.  My nino skepticism is waning.  Latest weekly 3.4 was up to +0.2C.

figure4-3.png.f60c82053578679d12a8cc1c6c1bffe1.png

figure4-3.pngd.png.b886a070d1b637fc111eeee608198504.png

Capture.JPG.3a2037c46e80733de9f72b3f408eef7c.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope to see the CANSIPS continue with the modki theme nino with the update on Monday. CFS has a modki as well but the model output makes no sense for that type of nino. Modki ninos usually yield lots of wintertime fruit. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Mitchg said:

Hope to see the CANSIPS continue with the modki theme nino with the update on Monday. CFS has a modki as well but the model output makes no sense for that type of nino. Modki ninos usually yield lots of wintertime fruit. 

You don’t really need a modoki, though that is preferred. A weak to moderate El Niño works. Strong El Niño’s can be trouble and swing either way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, tombo82685 said:

You don’t really need a modoki, though that is preferred. A weak to moderate El Niño works. Strong El Niño’s can be trouble and swing either way.

JP & I use to laugh at the play on words: what one really needs is a "weak" strong El Nino ala 1957-8 and 2009-10.  At least in my book the ability for models to skillfully place the ssta within a couple of tenths or max ssta location are lower vs getting the general idea correct.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cansips had another good run for the winter with a pretty fun looking Jan and Feb. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/2/2018 at 3:10 PM, Mitchg said:

Cansips had another good run for the winter with a pretty fun looking Jan and Feb. 

Euro was a mizer December then much more to our liking in Jan. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mitchg said:

Euro was a mizer December then much more to our liking in Jan. 

Typical of ninos with December being blah. Then slowly getting better as winter progresses. Well unless it’s a strong Niño 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Average temperatures in Fairbanks have now begun their decline - a thread is appropriate.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8ef78c193565ca14994442117312508a--debbie-downer-haha-funny.jpg.1c3e1ca258ed79d08fe0946cfc6a2b4c.jpg

 

So you know where this post is going.  I don't know.  I have seen enough el nino bandwagon jumping spring/summer modeling to remain skeptical and am not going to even go there about how every el nino is automatically a modoki because it's the only type we can have.  All others need not apply.

The SSTA are not rip roaring as of now and taking a look at the weeklies, they have actually cooled.

navy-anom-bb.gif.3a68bf74e06872be7078f6b330aa1be9.gif

Just because the sub surface is warm doesn't necessarily translate to the surface without the assistance of MJO waves.  There is a healthy MJO wave in phase 5 as of today, it would help el nino's cause of this would sustain itself across the Pacific. The current Roundy outlook takes it into the central Pacific before weakening it.

Now that I took away the punch bowl, let me bring Tom's two cases of beer to the party. Dynamical/statistical models still outlook the el nino to the moderate threshold later than usual in winter ala 1968-69, only recent comparison I have found.  If I had to choose a phase for this winter today I probably would go with enso neutral positive. While I am personally not all modoki about modoki, region 1,2 remains pretty cool (yes it is the most volatile) and that (1,2 leading the ssta category) is probably the only oh no flash point for winter.  I don't recall outside of the 1950s another nino that was dominated by 1,2 so I am not going there either.  It seems that the only enso state (and who know how the climate is changing if this even holds now) that is a true downer is a strong la nina and that is not happening this winter.  Given the higher pwats overall I would argue that the true winter PHL snowfall climo "normal" is now closer to 30" so even a Tony Downer enso neutral positive winter (with 1,2 not leading the way) is not at all a snowless winter by any means.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW, sun has continued to get quieter and quieter as the year progresses. 

 

Just about 3 weeks of no sunspots. I know the theory of quiet sun=increased arctic blocking episodes. 

7E418A41-18C3-4CCC-A9FD-192748925CAC.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Feb said:

Should I cancel winter yet? 🤓

Don't wait until late January this time.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Amy says its too early to dust off the 09/10 analog

butlerwinter.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Chubbs said:

Amy says its too early to dust off the 09/10 analog

butlerwinter.png

There is no dynamical or statistical model that is outlooking ssta in the 09-10 range and given they tend to run extreme, I can't say I disagree with Amy. 

I would be more impressed if someone came out with an outlook for this winter that had Dec & Feb stinking and January & March rocking.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Arctic sea (or lack thereof) ice is what it is these days.  Another set-up for the new normal of above normal October snow spread.  Sad part for summer is that the guns ablazing snow spread in October & November has no staying power the ensuing late spring/summer.

Untitled.png.200776e504b6b52950aecb37945b7dc2.png

 

oct.JPG

ssss.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Chubbs said:

Per blog below, the current SHemi Pacific favors a weak/central Pac nino

https://www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/enso/look-south-enso-forecasters

As per the blog, I don't understand how 2009-10 could be classified as weak.  The tri-monthly ssta maxed at +1.6C.  Granted 1,2 was not the warmest, but 3.4 had the greatest positive departures.  Granted it is a sample size of 2 (1957-8 the other), but 2009-10 was the second perfect weak strong el nino.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A warm pool has developed south of AK again weaker but similar to 2013-14. :smileys-snowman-838525: However, I would pump the breaks rather quick here. 

Goals still for Warmer water 3.4 than 1.2  with hopefully sneaking up to a weak to moderate nino. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×